MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392282868 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2023.3344091

Guest Editorial Human-Centric Communication and Networking for Metaverse Over 5G and Beyond Networks—Part I

2024· editorial· en· W4392282868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNanjing Institute of TechnologyUniversity of MichiganPurdue University
KeywordsComputer scienceMetaverseHuman–computer interactionData scienceComputer networkVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaverse, a hypothetical digital environment linking the cyber world and the physical world, is expected to revolutionize the way people interact. In the metaverse, people interact with objects, the environment, and each other through digital representations of themselves or avatars across time and space. For example, in the metaverse, people can have meetings with colleagues hundreds of miles away. They can also walk through the aisles of a store, find the best fit and have it delivered to their doorstep. It is also possible to simulate the optimal process manufacturing line to adjust for product variation and minimize bottlenecks, or test an innovative aircraft wing design without building expensive prototypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it