MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392283199 · doi:10.1089/derm.2023.0276

Cheilitis: A Diagnostic Algorithm and Review of Underlying Etiologies

2024· review· en· W4392283199 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deepika Narayanan, Megan Rogge

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatitis · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyMedicineDermatologyDesquamationErythemaIrritant contact dermatitisContact dermatitisAllergyPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Cheilitis, or inflammation of the lips, is a common reason for dermatologic consultation. The inflammation can include the vermillion lip, vermillion border, and surrounding skin, and can present with an acute or chronic course. There are many etiologies, including irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, atopic cheilitis, actinic cheilitis, infectious etiologies, nutritional deficiencies, drug-induced cheilitis, and rare etiologies, including granulomatous cheilitis, cheilitis glandularis, plasma cell cheilitis, lupus cheilitis, and exfoliative cheilitis. Distinguishing among the various etiologies of cheilitis is clinically difficult, as many causes may produce similar erythema and superficial desquamation of mucosal skin. In addition, patients report dryness, redness, irritation, burning, fissuring, and itch in many of the underlying causes. Thus, the specific etiology of cheilitis is often difficult to diagnose, requiring extensive testing and treatment trials. In this review, we summarize the various types of cheilitis, synthesizing novel cases, clinical presentations, histopathology, epidemiology, and advancements in diagnostic methods and therapeutics. We provide a diagnostic algorithm aimed to assist clinicians in the management of cheilitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatitisSame topicNail Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207