MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392286050 · doi:10.23880/whsj-16000215

Menstrual Problems: Menorrhagia and Primary Dysmenorrhagia

2024· article· en· W4392286050 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Raza Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health Science Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsPrimary (astronomy)MedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menstrual problems can considerably affect a girl’s status in life, accompanied by two universal issues: menorrhagia and basic dysmenorrhea. Menorrhagia, characterized by difficult menstrual draining, is a condition in which a woman experiences extended periods or excessive blood flow. This condition may incapacitate you, leading to blood deficiency, fatigue, and public restraints. The underlying causes of menorrhagia can change, including hormonal imbalances, uterine Fibroids, or added medical environments, which typically include a particularized record of what happened and a physical examination attended by potential situations such as cure, hormonal therapy, or surgical attack. Primary dysmenorrhea, in another way, refers to harsh menstrual cramps without some fundamental healing condition. It is a common issue among daughters and usually occurs during the first few days of the period. The exact cause of basic dysmenorrhea is not well understood; however, it is expected to be associated with prostaglandin production and uterine shortening. Women with primary dysmenorrhea grant permission for sharp, incapacitating pain, nausea, and additional discomfort, which upset their regular lives. Management options include pain relievers, hormonal contraceptives, behavioral changes, and heat therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s Health Science JournalSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207