Novel heterozygous <i>PRPH2</i> variant identified in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 and macular dystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To report on a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 (SCA14) and macular dystrophy with identification of a novel PRPH2 variant.Methods Case report.Results A 63-year-old female with molecularly confirmed SCA14 presented with symmetric pigmentary disturbances in a perifoveal distribution resembling a pattern macular dystrophy. She had no history of using medications with recognized toxic macular effects. Subsequent genetic testing confirmed a novel heterozygous missense variant of unknown significance in PRPH2 (PRPH2: c.694 G>A, p.(Ala232Thr)).Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first case of macular dystrophy identified in a patient with SCA14. While it is possible that the macular dystrophy observed in this patient might be an under-reported phenotype associated with SCA14, the pattern of macular changes is consistent with PRPH2-related disorders. The identified missense variant is predicted to be damaging by most in silico models, and the residue is highly conserved, adding support to a dual genetic diagnosis in this case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".