Parameter Estimation in Brain Dynamics Models from Resting-State fMRI Data using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Conventional modeling of the Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal in resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rsfMRI) struggle with parameter estimation due to the complexity of brain dynamics. This study introduces a novel brain dynamics model (BDM) that directly captures BOLD signal variations through differential equations. Unlike dynamic causal models or neural mass models, we integrate hemodynamic responses into the signal dynamics, considering both direct and network-mediated neuronal activity effects. We utilize Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to estimate the parameters of this BDM, leveraging their ability to embed physical laws into the learning process. This approach simplifies computational demands and increases robustness against data noise, providing a comprehensive tool for analyzing rsfMRI data. Leveraging the functional connectivity matrices scaled by the estimated parameters, we apply a state-of-the-art community detection method to elucidate the network structure. Our analysis reveals significant differences in the participation coefficients of specific brain regions when comparing neurotypical individuals to those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), with distinct patterns observed between male and female cohorts. These differences are consistent with regions implicated in previous studies, reinforcing the role of these areas in ASD. By integrating PINNs with advanced network analysis, we demonstrate a robust approach for dissecting the complex neural signatures of ASD, providing a promising direction for future research in neuroimaging and the broader field of computational neuroscience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".