MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392293562 · doi:10.1038/s41371-024-00903-8

ACHIEVE conference proceedings: implementing action plans to reduce and control hypertension burden in Africa

2024· review· en· W4392293562 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Olowoyo, Anastase Dzudié, Akinkunmi Paul Okekunle, Reginald Obiako, Ana Olga Mocumbi, Hind Beheiry, Gianfranco Parati, Daniel T. Lackland, Fred Stephen Sarfo, Augustine N. Odili, Abiodun M. Adeoye, Kolawole Wahab, Charles Agyemang, Norman R.C. Campbell, André Pascal Kengne, Paul K. Whelton, Pierpaolo Pellicori, Ad Adams Ebenezer, Oladimeji Adebayo, Oladotun Olalusi, Ayodele Jegede, Ezinne Uvere, Olayinka Adebajo, Baffour Awuah, Andrew E. Moran, Bryan Williams, Tomasz J. Guzik, Collins Kokuro, Fred Bukachi, Okechukwu S. Ogah, Christian Delles, Pasquale Maffia, Rufus Akinyemi, Prebo Barango, Dike Ojji, Mayowa Owolabi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Hypertension · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersFogarty International CenterEconomic and Social Research CouncilNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Human Genome Research InstituteWorld Health Organization
KeywordsMedicineEpidemiologyControl (management)Action (physics)Healthcare systemCall to actionEnvironmental healthEconomic growthHealth careIntensive care medicineBusinessManagementMarketingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207