MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392294844 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2024.844

Working Together for Better Health: A United Effort to Support the National Strategy for Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada

2024· article· en· W4392294844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helen Mai, Trish Caetano, Carli Wallington

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRare diseaseGovernment (linguistics)Orphan drugBusinessInvestment (military)MedicineDiseaseEconomic growthPolitical scienceBioinformaticsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

February 29 is Rare Disease Day — an occasion that inspires action and solidarity to address the challenges and opportunities of rare diseases. To address the issues faced by patients with rare diseases, in March 2023, the Government of Canada announced a national strategy for drugs for rare diseases, with an investment of up to $1.5 billion over 3 years. The strategy aims to increase the accessibility and affordability of drugs for rare diseases for patients across Canada. CADTH-led initiatives are primarily related to improving the collection, use, and quality of evidence to inform and support decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0160.005
Open science0.0050.010
Research integrity0.0180.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.359
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→