MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392297394 · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.81.99

Una apreciación retórica de un clásico sociológico

2024· article· es· W4392297394 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Overington

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMarxism and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Para ilustrar la aproximación retórica a los textos de las ciencias sociales, este trabajo aborda El Suicidio, de Durkheim, considerado en general como un modelo positivista, y lo lee como un discurso moral. La primera parte propone la iluminación que se proyecta sobre sus pautas deargumentación cuando la obra es abordada como una respuesta a una coyuntura moldeable por un discurso persuasivo. La última parte presenta el estatus clásico de la obra como resultado de su utilización como una autoridad retórica en orden a la legitimación de un cierto tipo de sociología.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.038
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Investigaciones SociológicasSame topicMarxism and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207