Screening and early warning system for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with obstructive sleep apnoea based on the medical Internet of Things in three levels of healthcare: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are prevalent respiratory diseases in China and impose significant burdens on the healthcare system. Moreover, the co-occurrence of COPD and OSA exacerbates clinical outcomes significantly. However, comprehensive epidemiological investigations in China remain scarce, and the defining characteristics of the population affected by COPD and OSA, alongside their intrinsic relationship, remain ambiguous. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We present a protocol for a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study based on a digital health management platform across three different healthcare tiers in five sites among Chinese patients with COPD. The study aims to establish predicative models to identify OSA among patients with COPD and to predict the prognosis of overlap syndrome (OS) and acute exacerbations of COPD through the Internet of Things (IoT). Moreover, it aims to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IoT in managing chronic diseases within clinical settings. Participants will undergo baseline assessment, physical examination and nocturnal oxygen saturation measuring. Specific questionnaires screening for OSA will also be administered. Diagnostic lung function tests and polysomnography will be performed to confirm COPD and OSA, respectively. All patients will undergo scheduled follow-ups for 12 months to record the changes in symptoms, lung functions and quality of life. Primary outcomes include the prevalence and characteristics of OS, while secondary outcomes encompass OS prognosis and the feasibility of the management model in clinical contexts. A total of 682 patients with COPD will be recruited over 12-24 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Peking University Third Hospital, and all study participants will provide written informed consent. Study results will be published in an appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various stakeholder engagement activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04833725.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".