Control4Life: A randomized controlled trial protocol examining the feasibility and efficacy of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise fitness program for individuals undergoing prostatectomy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI), erectile dysfunction and cardiometabolic conditions are common after prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). Although physical activity could improve overall survival and quality of survivorship, fear of UI can restrict participation in exercise. Individuals with PCa could benefit from therapeutic exercise programming to support continence recovery and cardiometabolic health. AIM: The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and the effects of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise fitness program on UI after prostatectomy. The combined exercise program will be delivered both in-person and virtually. METHODS: This study follows a modified Zelen, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial design. A total of 106 individuals with PCa will be recruited before prostatectomy surgery. Participants will be randomized between two groups: one receiving usual care and one receiving a combined exercise fitness and intensive pelvic floor muscle training program. Exercise programming will begin 6-8 weeks after prostatectomy and will last 12 weeks. Outcomes include: the 24-h pad test (primary outcome for UI); physical fitness, metabolic indicators, and patient-reported outcomes on erectile function, self-efficacy, severity of cancer symptoms and quality of life. Important timepoints for assessments include before surgery (T0), after surgery (T1), after intervention (T3) and at one-year after surgery (T4). CONCLUSION: This study will inform the feasibility of offering comprehensive exercise programming that has the potential to positively impact urinary continence, erectile function and cardiometabolic health of individuals undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer. CLINICALTRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06072911.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".