A simple 1H (12C/13C) filtered experiment to quantify and trace isotope enrichment in complex environmental and biological samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) based 13C tracing has broad applications across medical and environmental research. As many biological and environmental samples are heterogeneous, they experience considerable spectral overlap and relatively low signal. Here a 1D 1H–12C/13C is introduced that uses “in-phase/opposite-phase” encoding to simultaneously detect and discriminate both protons attached to 12C and 13C at full 1H sensitivity in every scan. Unlike traditional approaches that focus on the 12C/13C satellite ratios in a 1H spectrum, this approach creates separate sub-spectra for the 12C and 13C bound protons. These spectra can be used for both quantitative and qualitative analysis of complex samples with significant spectral overlap. Due to the presence of the 13C dipole, faster relaxation of the 1H–13C pairs results in slight underestimation compared to the 1H–12C pairs. However, this is easily compensated for, by collecting an additional reference spectrum, from which the absolute percentage of 13C can be calculated by difference. When combined with the result, 12C and 13C percent enrichment in both 1H–12C and 1H–13C fractions are obtained. As the approach uses isotope filtered 1H NMR for detection, it retains nearly the same sensitivity as a standard 1H spectrum. Here, a proof-of-concept is performed using simple mixtures of 12C and 13C glucose, followed by suspended algal cells with varying 12C /13C ratios representing a complex mixture. The results consistently return 12C/13C ratios that deviate less than 1 % on average from the expected. Finally, the sequence was used to monitor and quantify 13C% enrichment in Daphnia magna neonates which were fed a 13C diet over 1 week. The approach helped reveal how the organisms utilized the 12C lipids they are born with vs. the 13C lipids they assimilate from their diet during growth. Given the experiments simplicity, versatility, and sensitivity, we anticipate it should find broad application in a wide range of tracer studies, such as fluxomics, with applications spanning various disciplines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".