DTox: A deep neural network-based <i>in visio</i> lens for large scale toxicogenomics data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advancement of large-scale omics technologies, particularly transcriptomics data sets on drug and treatment response repositories available in public domain, toxicogenomics has emerged as a key field in safety pharmacology and chemical risk assessment. Traditional statistics-based bioinformatics analysis poses challenges in its application across multidimensional toxicogenomic data, including administration time, dosage, and gene expression levels. Motivated by the visual inspection workflow of field experts to augment their efficiency of screening significant genes to derive meaningful insights, together with the ability of deep neural architectures to learn the image signals, we developed DTox, a deep neural network-based in visio approach. Using the Percellome toxicogenomics database, instead of utilizing the numerical gene expression values of the transcripts (gene probes of the microarray) for dose-time combinations, DTox learned the image representation of 3D surface plots of distinct time and dosage data points to train the classifier on the experts' labels of gene probe significance. DTox outperformed statistical threshold-based bioinformatics and machine learning approaches based on numerical expression values. This result shows the ability of image-driven neural networks to overcome the limitations of classical numeric value-based approaches. Further, by augmenting the model with explainability modules, our study showed the potential to reveal the visual analysis process of human experts in toxicogenomics through the model weights. While the current work demonstrates the application of the DTox model in toxicogenomic studies, it can be further generalized as an in visio approach for multi-dimensional numeric data with applications in various fields in medical data sciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".