Bibliographic record
Abstract
man Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Twenty-First Century in 2012, we lingered to catch our breath, ponder the difficulties and rewards of the completed ascent, and enjoy the expansive summit views. Soon, however, it became clear that there were other, even higher and more remote mountains beckoning our attention. After deliberating approaches, routes, and equipment, we gathered a core group of seasoned mountaineers from the previous ascent, as well as some new cohorts. Thanks to the relentless enthusiasm, effort, and stamina of our expedition team, we are proud to deliver Mountains of the German Mind: Translations from Gessner to Messner, 1541Messner, -2009. . Our team was able to assemble on two different occasions: first at the Thinking Mountains Interdisciplinary Summit in Banff, Canada, in 2018; and again at the 2019 German Studies Association Conference in Portland, Oregon. We wish to thank these venues as well as the panelists who discussed joint objectives, strategies, and visions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".