MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392327684

Observation of Irminger sea deep convection by Argo floats during the 2002-2015 period

2015· preprint· en· W4392327684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Piron

Bibliographic record

Venuetheses.fr (ABES) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgoPeriod (music)OceanographyDeep convectionClimatologyDeep seaGeologyEnvironmental scienceConvectionMeteorologyGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les évènements de convection profonde sont importants car ils forment les masses d'eau intermédiaires et profondes qui nourrissent la circulation globale. La mer du Labrador, qui forme la Labrador Sea Water (LSW), est le site le plus documenté de l'océan Atlantique Nord. La mer d'lrminger a également été citée mais n'est pas entièrement reconnue à cause du manque d'observations directes. Cette thèse fournit la première description de la convection profonde en mer d'lrminger à l'échelle du bassin grâce aux données Argo. Trois évènements de convection se sont produits en mer d'lrminger depuis 2010. Au cours de l'hiver 2O11-2O12, la convection atteint 1000 m et est expliquée par la séquence d'apparition des tip jets groenlandais.La convection de l'hiver 2O13-2O14, qui atteint 1300 m, est caractérisée par un préconditionnement particulièrement important et un forçage par les tip jets faible. La convection de l'hiver 2O14-2O15, qui atteint 1700 m, montre des tip jets très nombreux et persistants. L'advection de LSW provenant de la mer du Labrador explique les profondeurs exceptionnelles observées au cours de ces deux derniers hivers. Les résultats montrent que la convection n'est pas rare en mer d'lrminger et qu'elle joue un rôle non négligeable sur l'équilibre climatique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetheses.fr (ABES)Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207