Atrophy network mapping of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in frontotemporal dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a disease of high heterogeneity, apathy and disinhibition present in all subtypes of FTD and imposes a significant burden on families/society. Traditional neuroimaging analysis has limitations in elucidating the network localization due to individual clinical and neuroanatomical variability. The study aims to identify the atrophy network map associated with different FTD clinical subtypes and determine the specific localization of the network for apathy and disinhibition. Eighty FTD patients [45 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and 35 semantic variant progressive primary aphasia (svPPA)] and 58 healthy controls at Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled as Dataset 1; 112 FTD patients including 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA and 30 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) cases, and 110 healthy controls from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI) dataset were included as Dataset 2. Initially, single-subject atrophy maps were defined by comparing cortical thickness in each FTD patient versus healthy controls. Next, the network of brain regions functionally connected to each FTD patient's location of atrophy was determined using seed-based functional connectivity in a large (n = 1000) normative connectome. Finally, we used atrophy network mapping to define clinical subtype-specific network (45 bvFTD, 35 svPPA and 58 healthy controls in Dataset 1; 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA, 30 nfvPPA and 110 healthy controls in Dataset 2) and symptom-specific networks [combined Datasets 1 and 2, apathy without depression versus non-apathy without depression (80:26), disinhibition versus non-disinhibition (88:68)]. We compare the result with matched symptom networks derived from patients with focal brain lesions or conjunction analysis. Through the analysis of two datasets, we identified heterogeneity in atrophy patterns among FTD patients. However, these atrophy patterns are connected to a common brain network. The primary regions affected by atrophy in FTD included the frontal and temporal lobes, particularly the anterior temporal lobe. bvFTD connects to frontal and temporal cortical areas, svPPA mainly impacts the anterior temporal region and nfvPPA targets the inferior frontal gyrus and precentral cortex regions. The apathy-specific network was localized in the orbital frontal cortex and ventral striatum, while the disinhibition-specific network was localized in the bilateral orbital frontal gyrus and right temporal lobe. Apathy and disinhibition atrophy networks resemble known motivational and criminal lesion networks, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the apathy/disinhibition scores and functional connectivity between atrophy maps and the peak of the networks. This study localizes the common network of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in FTD, guiding future FTD neuromodulation interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".