MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392343679 · doi:10.1080/01496395.2024.2315607

Removal of Fe and Mn from Co leach solutions by adsorption on activated carbon based on post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) - Mechanism insights through linear and nonlinear isotherm and kinetic models

2024· article· en· W4392343679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPolyethylene terephthalateAdsorptionActivated carbonKinetic energyCarbon fibersSorption isothermChemical engineeringFreundlich equationInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The removal of Fe2+ and Mn2+ from cobalt sulfate-saturated solutions is frequently problematic for Cu-Co hydrometallurgical process performance. Among the applied and developed methods for the removal of these metals, adsorption has drawn less attention. This study investigates on the removal of Fe2+ and Mn2+ in industrial cobalt solutions known as raffinates by adsorption on activated carbon prepared from post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The adsorption operating conditions were studied in synthetic solutions and industrial solutions. The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherms were then used to fit the adsorption data, while the pseudo-first-order (PFO), pseudo-second-order (PSO), and Elovich models were used to describe the kinetics. Linear and nonlinear kinetic and isotherm models were studied and compared. Furthermore, intraparticle diffusion (IPD) models were used to study the transfer mass mechanism. The results show that Fe2+ and Mn2+ are removed from Co solutions with the efficiencies of 62.14 and 68.43, respectively. The Langmuir model fits the Fe2+ and Mn2+ adsorption data better, indicating that chemisorption is preferred over physisorption, whereas the Freundlich model fits the Co2+ adsorption data better, indicating that physisorption is preferred over chemisorption. The PFO model describes well the kinetic behavior of Fe2+ and Mn2+, whereas the Elovich model describes better the kinetic behavior of Co2+. According to the IPD model, the step that limits the adsorption of Fe2+, Mn2+, and Co2+ is essentially diffusion through the activated carbon pores. The reported experimental results will highlight the use of activated carbon in the removal of Fe2+ and Mn2+ in Cu and Co hydrometallurgy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it