MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392343770 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108957

Performance of concrete superficially treated with nano-modified coatings under sulfuric acid exposures

2024· article· en· W4392343770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Works and Government Services CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsSulfuric acidNano-Materials scienceComposite materialForensic engineeringMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protection of concrete surface layer is crucial for preserving serviceability and durability of concrete structures during their service life. Chemical attack by sulfuric acid is an aggressive exposure, commonly causing significant damage to concrete elements such as buildings' foundations and basement walls, buildings and structures affected by acid rain, industrial facilities, and wastewater treatment facilities. Hence, this study endeavored to evaluate the performance of nano-modified composites as surface treatments for concrete under severe chemical exposures. Nano-calcium carbonate and nano-clay particles were dispersed at different dosages (0, 2.5, and 5% by mass) in the neat coatings: vinyl ester (membrane-forming polymer) and silane (hydrophobic agent). Moreover, an amorphous colloidal silica (SiO2>50%) was also used as a superficial treatment for concrete. These coatings were applied to concrete specimens with water-to-binder ratios (w/b) of 0.40 (representing good quality/low penetrability concrete treated for prohibition of deterioration) and 0.60 (representing deteriorated/high penetrability concrete in need for rehabilitation). the wettability and initial transport characteristics of the coated concrete specimens were determined. In addition, the durability of superficially treated concrete specimens was examined under two aggressive exposures: full submergence in a 5% (by volume) sulfuric acid solution, and 5% sulfuric acid solution combined with wetting-drying cycles. During both exposures, the deterioration of concrete specimens was observed by visual inspection and quantified in terms of mass change. Furthermore, the damage mechanisms and coatings’ performance were studied by microstructural, mineralogical, and thermal analyses. The overall results showed that vinyl ester and vinyl ester nanocomposites significantly improved the durability of concrete specimens by an average of around 64% relative to that of the silane and silane nanocomposites; hence, they are recommended for field applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it