MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392344424 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190110

Impact of New Varieties on the Yield and Quality of Wheat, Oats, and Sudangrass in North-Eastern Kazakhstan

2024· article· en· W4392344424 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baizhan Ualkhanov, Kudaybergen Konopiyanov, Ludmila Bekenova, Natalya Zhukova, Aigul Mukhamadiyeva

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYield (engineering)AgronomyQuality (philosophy)GeographyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper explores breeding and seed production in Northeastern Kazakhstan, specifically focusing on the introduction of new wheat, oats, and Sudangrass varieties by LLP "Pavlodar Agricultural Experimental Station".The research, conducted across 16 experimental sites in various districts of Akmola, North Kazakhstan, Karaganda, Pavlodar, and Kostanay regions, used standard field and laboratory methods to enhance agricultural yields and bolster food security in the region.The varieties of spring wheat (Anel-16 and Ertis 7), oats (Ertis samaly and Mirny), and Sudangrass (Dostyk 15) were investigated.The yield of crops, the weight of 1000 seeds, the protein and gluten content in wheat and oat grains, and the yield of normalised dry matter in the harvest of Sudangrass are determined.Variance and correlation analysis are used for statistical processing.The influence of weather conditions (average daily air temperature, precipitation amount, and Selyaninov hydrothermal coefficient for the growing season 2017-2019) on crop development and protein content in wheat and oat grains, and the herbage of Sudangrass have been established.The most favourable areas of cultivation of the varieties of agricultural crops are indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementFrench-language works237,207