A Curated Compendium of Transcriptomic Data for the Exploration of Neocortical Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Vast quantities of multi-omic data have been produced to characterize the development and diversity of cell types in the cerebral cortex of humans and other mammals. To more fully harness the collective discovery potential of these data, we have assembled gene-level transcriptomic data from 188 published studies of neocortical development, including the transcriptomes of ∼30 million single-cells, extensive spatial transcriptomic experiments and RNA sequencing of sorted cells and bulk tissues: nemoanalytics.org/landing/neocortex . Applying joint matrix decomposition ( SJD ) to mouse, macaque and human data in this collection, we defined transcriptome dynamics that are conserved across mammalian neurogenesis and which elucidate the evolution of outer, or basal, radial glial cells. Decomposition of adult human neocortical data identified layer-specific signatures in mature neurons and, in combination with transfer learning methods in NeMO Analytics, enabled the charting of their early developmental emergence and protracted maturation across years of postnatal life. Interrogation of data from cerebral organoids demonstrated that while broad molecular elements of in vivo development are recapitulated in vitro , many layer-specific transcriptomic programs in neuronal maturation are absent. We invite computational biologists and cell biologists without coding expertise to use NeMO Analytics in their research and to fuel it with emerging data ( carlocolantuoni.org ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".