Deep generative priors for biomolecular 3D heterogeneous reconstruction from cryo-EM projections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy has become a powerful tool to determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of rigid biological macromolecules from noisy micrographs with single-particle reconstruction. Recently, deep neural networks, e.g., CryoDRGN, have demonstrated conformational and compositional heterogeneity of complexes. However, the lack of ground-truth conformations poses a challenge to assess the performance of heterogeneity analysis methods. In this work, variational autoencoders (VAE) with three types of deep generative priors were learned for latent variable inference and heterogeneous 3D reconstruction via Bayesian inference. More specifically, VAEs with "Variational Mixture of Posteriors" priors (VampPrior-SPR), non-parametric exemplar-based priors (ExemplarPrior-SPR) and priors from latent score-based generative models (LSGM-SPR) were quantitatively compared with CryoDRGN. We built four simulated datasets composed of hypothetical continuous conformation or discrete states of the hERG K + channel. Empirical and quantitative comparisons of inferred latent representations were performed with affine-transformation-based metrics. These models with more informative priors gave better regularized, interpretable factorized latent representations with better conserved pairwise distances, less deformed latent distributions and lower within-cluster variances. They were also tested on experimental datasets to resolve compositional and conformational heterogeneity (50S ribosome assembly, cowpea chlorotic mottle virus, and pre-catalytic spliceosome) with comparable high resolution. Codes and data are available: https://github.com/benjamin3344/DGP-SPR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".