Automated determination of 8-OHdG in cells and tissue via immunofluorescence using a specially created antibody
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite powerful DNA repair systems, oxidative damage/modification to DNA is an inevitable side effect of metabolism, ionizing radiation, lifestyle habits, inflammatory pathologies such as type-2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome, cancer and natural aging. One of the most common oxidative DNA modifications is 8-OHdG (8‑hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine), which is the most widely used marker in research and clinical diagnostics. 8-OHdG is easily and specifically detectable in various samples such as urine, plasma, cells and tissues via a large variety of methods like ELISA, HPLC, chromatographic methods, and immunochemistry. Formed by oxidation of guanine and being representative for the degree of DNA damage, 8-OHdG can be also used as biomarker for risk assessment of various cancers as well as degenerative diseases. Here, we present a highly specific, self-developed 8-OHdG antibody in successful comparison to a commercially one, tested in cells (FF95, HCT116, and HT22) and intestinal tissue, focusing on automatized evaluation via fluorescence/confocal microscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it