MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392347131 · doi:10.1111/mbe.12407

Reflections on the past two decades of Mind, Brain, and Education

2024· article· en· W4392347131 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ola Ozernov‐Palchik, Courtney Pollack, Elizabeth Bonawitz, Joanna A. Christodoulou, Nadine Gaab, John D. E. Gabrieli, Patricia Monticello Kievlan, C.A. Kirby, Grace C. Lin, Gigi Luk, Charles A. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueMind Brain and Education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHarvard Graduate School of EducationJacobs FoundationPorticus FoundationFordham UniversityJames S. McDonnell Foundation
KeywordsPsychologyEpistemologyCognitive sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of-its-kind, focused on the intersection of neurobiology, psychology, and educational research and practice (Blake & Gardner, 2007;Fischer, 2009).Between its first cohort in 2004 and its final cohort in 2022, the program graduated 668 students from around the world (see Figure 1).Contemporaneously, scholars developed MBE or related Educational Neuroscience initiatives in several US states, Canada, the United Kingdom, Austria, The Netherlands, China, Israel, across Latin America, and other locations around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.035
Scholarly communication0.0150.031
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0160.042
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMind Brain and Education→Same topicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function→French-language works237,207→