MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392348183 · doi:10.18280/ts.410115

Multimodel-Based Gait Recognition Method with Joint Motion Constraints

2024· article· en· W4392348183 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yanjun Qi, Yi Xu, Xuan He

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)GaitComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMotion (physics)Computer visionGait analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringMedicineStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intricate and restricted movements of joints form the core of pedestrian gait characteristics, with these traits externally reflected through the overall and synchronized gait movements.Thus, identifying features of such coordinated motions significantly boosts the discriminative effectiveness of gait analysis.Addressing this, we have introduced a novel gait feature mining approach that amalgamates multi-semantic information, effectively utilizing the combined strengths of silhouette and skeleton data through a meticulously designed dual-branch network.This network aims to isolate coordinated constraint features from these distinct modalities.To derive the coordinated constraint features from silhouette data, we crafted a silhouette posture graph, which employs 2D skeleton data to navigate through the silhouette's obscured portions, alongside a specialized local micro-motion constraint module.This module's integration of feature maps allows for the detailed extraction of features indicative of limb coordination.Concurrently, for the nuanced extraction of joint motion constraints, we developed a global motion graph convolution operator.This operator layers the motion constraint relations of physically separate joints onto the human skeleton graph's adjacency matrix, facilitating a comprehensive capture of both local and overarching limb motion constraints.Furthermore, a constraint attention module has been innovated to dynamically emphasize significant coordinated motions within the feature channels, thus enriching the representation of pivotal coordinated motions.This advanced network underwent thorough training and validation on the CASIA-B dataset.The ensuing experimental outcomes affirm the method's efficacy, demonstrating commendable recognition accuracy and remarkable stability across varying viewing angles and dynamic walking conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207