MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392348327 · doi:10.18280/ts.410134

Enhancing Secure Data Transmission in IoT via Advanced Conditional Generative Adversarial Network and Encryption Techniques

2024· article· en· W4392348327 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gopu A. Palanisamy, Sivaraj Rajappan, Vijayakumar Murugasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceComputer networkAdversarial systemSecure transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Generative adversarial networkData transmissionArtificial intelligenceDeep learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addressing the challenge of secure data transmission within the Internet of Things (IoT) necessitates robust solutions.Deep learning has emerged as a potent tool for threat analysis and response to security incidents in the IoT landscape.A particular method, namely the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), is utilized for identifying attacks during secure data transmission.Despite its usefulness, GANs are not devoid of shortcomings, such as mode collapse, which limits the diversity of the generator's output.This issue often arises from training difficulties when the generator encounters a specific type of data that easily deceives the discriminator.To mitigate these limitations, this study introduces an enhanced model of the GAN, the Conditional GAN (CGAN), featuring two generators and two discriminators (G1, G2, and D1, D2).This model, when amalgamated with cryptographic techniques, effectively addresses the mode collapse issue.Furthermore, Algebraic Matrix Encryption (AME) and Improved Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) algorithms are proposed as secure data transmission solutions.To evaluate the diversity of the generated fake samples, the Jaro-Winkler similarity measure is employed.A comprehensive comparison of the proposed model's efficiency is conducted, incorporating metrics such as Jaro-Winkler accuracy test, training time, loss, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Percent Root Mean Square Difference (PRD), recall, F-score, mean, and standard deviation.According to the analysis, the proposed model surpasses the performance of AEGAN and MTC-GAN, thereby demonstrating its potential in enhancing secure data transmission in IoT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207