MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392348803 · doi:10.18280/ts.410104

Enhanced Hearing Aid Performance with an African Buffalo Optimization-Based Frequency Response Masking Filter

2024· article· en· W4392348803 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anjali Shrivastav, Sheetal U. Bhandari, Mahesh T. Kolte

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSavitribai Phule Pune University
KeywordsComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Hearing aidField-programmable gate arrayFinite impulse responseMasking (illustration)AdderPipeline (software)Computer hardwareSpeech recognitionAlgorithmEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hearing aid systems rely on reconfigurable filters to selectively amplify desired signals while suppressing unwanted noise.However, the complexity of the hardware and the associated power dissipation present substantial challenges, particularly in systems where adaptability and scalability are crucial.These systems require advanced auditory compensation to accommodate the diverse auditory profiles of individuals with hearing impairments.In this study, an African buffalo-inspired optimization algorithm is introduced to fine-tune a Frequency Response Masking Reconfigurable Filter (AB-FRMRF).This novel approach ensures High-Q filtering with narrow transition bands while maintaining a low filter order, thereby enhancing selectivity and minimizing complexity.The optimization algorithm adjusts its search strategy based on solution fitness, optimizing the filter's coefficient values.Performance parameters such as matching error and group delay are meticulously tuned for optimal auditory compensation.Utilizing distributed arithmetic for hardware realization and a Brent Kung adder for the summation of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) partial products, the hardware design deviates from conventional pipeline adder trees, culminating in significant power savings and improved processing speed.Modeled in MATLAB and implemented on a Kintex 7 FPGA Genesys 2 board, the AB-FRMRF model exhibits a reduced matching error down to 1.2 dB and a minimized delay to 2.5 msec for high-frequency sounds in cases of mild hearing loss.These metrics are favorable in comparison to existing reconfigurable filters reported in the literature.The AB-FRMRF model not only demonstrates a 35% improvement in power consumption but also outperforms traditional methods in computational complexity, auditory compensation, delay, and power metrics, making it highly suitable for hearing aid applications.The proposed filter design signifies a substantial advancement in auditory assistance technology, aligning with the necessity for high-performance, low-power hearing aid devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207