VADNet: Visual-Based Anti-Cheating Detection Network in FPS Games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevalence of cheating in first-person shooter (FPS) games poses a formidable challenge, undermining user experience and the integrity of competitive play.In response to this issue, a visual-based anti-cheating detection network, termed VADNet, has been developed, harnessing the capabilities of deep learning and computer vision techniques.VADNet incorporates a focus module designed to segment high-resolution images, alongside a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) for the fusion of multi-scale features, culminating in a classifier module tasked with the quantification of cheating behaviors.Rigorous experimentation on a dataset derived from a real online FPS game substantiates VADNet's efficacy in identifying players who resort to cheating, as evidenced by high precision, recall, and F1 scores.This investigation advances the field of anti-cheating mechanisms for FPS games, offering a robust and reliable system to preserve the fairness and integrity of online gaming environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".