MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392350919 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.29.582250

Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition

2024· preprint· en· W4392350919 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuyi Wang, Katya Krieger‐Redwood, Yanni Cui, Jonathan Smallwood, Yi Du, Elizabeth Jefferies

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCognitionSemantic memoryDefault mode networkCognitive psychologyAssociation (psychology)NeurocognitivePsychologyPrefrontal cortexSemantic featureSemantics (computer science)Modality (human–computer interaction)NeuroscienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding how the human brain adapts to varying cognitive demands is crucial in neuroscience. Here, we examined how networks involved in controlled semantic retrieval reconfigure themselves to generate neurocognitive states appropriate to different task contexts. We parametrically varied the demands of two semantic tasks - global association and feature matching judgments - and contrasted these effects of cognitive control with those of non-semantic tasks. We then characterized these effects on the cortical surface and within a whole-brain state space, anchored by the top three dimensions of intrinsic connectivity. Our results revealed that demanding semantic association tasks elicited more activation in the anterior regions of the prefrontal and temporal cortex. In contrast, difficult semantic feature matching tasks produced more posterior activation, aligning closely with regions engaged during multiple demanding non-semantic tasks. In both semantic feature matching and non-semantic contexts, the difficulty effects were situated towards the controlled end of a dimension capturing functional separation between cognitive control and default mode regions. Conversely, in semantic association tasks, the difficulty effects elicited similar responses across both cognitive control and default mode networks. Furthermore, controlled association and non-semantic control were located towards the heteromodal end of a heteromodal-unimodal dimension, while semantic feature matching involved a brain state that was more visual and unimodal. These findings demonstrate that a variety of brain states underpin controlled cognition. Specifically, cognitive control regions interact with heteromodal semantic knowledge system to identify contextually relevant conceptual overlaps (e.g., associating 'DOG' with 'BEACH'), and separate from heteromodal memory regions for modality-specific conceptual overlaps (e.g., connecting 'DALMATIAN' with 'BLACK AND WHITE').

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207