Connectome alterations following perinatal deafness in the cat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following sensory deprivation, areas and networks in the brain may adapt and reorganize to compensate for the loss of input. These adaptations are manifestations of compensatory crossmodal plasticity, which has been documented in both human and animal models of deafness-including the domestic cat. Although there are abundant examples of structural plasticity in deaf felines from retrograde tracer-based studies, there is a lack of diffusion-based knowledge involving this model compared to the current breadth of human research. The purpose of this study was to explore white matter structural adaptations in the perinatally-deafened cat via tractography, increasing the methodological overlap between species. Plasticity was examined by identifying unique group connections and assessing altered connectional strength throughout the entirety of the brain. Results revealed a largely preserved connectome containing a limited number of group-specific or altered connections focused within and between sensory networks, which is generally corroborated by deaf feline anatomical tracer literature. Furthermore, five hubs of cortical plasticity and altered communication following perinatal deafness were observed. The limited differences found in the present study suggest that deafness-induced crossmodal plasticity is largely built upon intrinsic structural connections, with limited remodeling of underlying white matter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".