MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392354173 · doi:10.1017/s0305004124000045

The uniform distribution modulo one of certain subsequences of ordinates of zeros of the zeta function

2024· article· en· W4392354173 on OpenAlexafffund
Fatma Çi̇çek, S. M. Gonek

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology GandhinagarUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsModuloGamma functionRiemann hypothesisMultiplicity (mathematics)CombinatoricsMathematicsZero (linguistics)Order (exchange)Riemann zeta functionOmegaSequence (biology)Distribution (mathematics)Number theoryPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis and a spacing hypothesis for the nontrivial zeros $1/2+i\gamma$ of the Riemann zeta function, we show that the sequence \begin{equation*}\Gamma_{[a, b]} =\Bigg\{ \gamma : \gamma>0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad \frac{ \log\big(| \zeta^{(m_{\gamma })} (\frac12+ i{\gamma }) | / (\!\log{{\gamma }} )^{m_{\gamma }}\big)}{\sqrt{\frac12\log\log {\gamma }}} \in [a, b] \Bigg\},\end{equation*} where the ${\gamma }$ are arranged in increasing order, is uniformly distributed modulo one. Here a and b are real numbers with $a<b$ , and $m_\gamma$ denotes the multiplicity of the zero $1/2+i{\gamma }$ . The same result holds when the ${\gamma }$ ’s are restricted to be the ordinates of simple zeros. With an extra hypothesis, we are also able to show an equidistribution result for the scaled numbers $\gamma (\!\log T)/2\pi$ with ${\gamma }\in \Gamma_{[a, b]}$ and $0<{\gamma }\leq T$ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietySame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207