MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392354366 · doi:10.18280/ria.380126

ECG Signal Reconstruction from PPG Using Hybrid Deep Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4392354366 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Ezzat, Osama A. Omer, Usama Sayed, Ahmed S. Mubarak

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Deep neural networksPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) and photoplethysmography (PPG) facilitate non-invasive cardiovascular monitoring; however, the correlation between their respective waveforms, which exhibit high cycle correlation, remains underexplored.This study aims to estimate ECG signals from PPG data using an array of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across varied transformation feature domains, thereby making PPG measurements a more expedient and less effort-intensive alternative to ECG acquisition.A novel, subject-specific deep learning model is introduced, combining the architectures of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), termed ConvBiLSTM.This hybrid model proposes an automatic method for ECG signal reconstruction.To ensure model robustness against deformation, spatial characteristics are first extracted using CNNs, followed by the extraction of temporal characteristics from the CNN output via BiLSTM.The BiLSTM approach mitigates the issues of gradient disappearance and expansion without compromising accuracy, an improvement over traditional RNN and LSTM methods.The performance of four distinct feature domains, namely the Time Domain (TD), Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), and Wavelet Scattering Transform (WST), is evaluated with regards to their efficacy in ECG signal reconstruction from PPG data using the ConvBiLSTM model.Superiority of the proposed DNN combination over individual DNNs was demonstrated through comparison of ConvBiLSTM performance.Simulation results reveal that our method achieves superior root mean square error (RMSE) in ECG signal reconstruction across all feature domains.Given the widespread application of RMSE in ECG monitoring, this metric was chosen as the key evaluation criterion.The combination of WST for PPG signals and DWT for ECG signal features demonstrated the lowest RMSE at 0.0654, indicating the potential of this approach for effective ECG signal reconstruction using PPG data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207