MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392354383 · doi:10.18280/ria.380104

The Histogram of Enhanced Gradients (HEG) - A Fast Descriptor for Noisy Face Recognition

2024· article· fr· W4392354383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fella Berrimi, Chafia Kara‐Mohamed, Riadh Hedli, Aboubekeur Hamdi‐Cherif

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistogramArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceFace (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemHistogram of oriented gradientsHistogram matchingComputer visionImage (mathematics)Linguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Descriptors serve as algorithms responsible for the representation and processing of multimedia files.One of the main challenges in these algorithms involves establishing a tradeoff among conflicting performance requirements such runtime, on the one hand, and standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall and F-score, on the other hand.To address this challenge, a novel descriptor named Histogram of Enhanced Gradients (HEG) is introduced for noisy face recognition.The methodology behind HEG involves enhancing local gradients prior to feature extraction, corroborated by the Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) descriptor and adaptive filtering.Initially, facial images are divided into blocks, and features are extracted from each block using magnitude and orientation maps to discriminate between edges, details, and flat regions.Then, these features undergo denoising with an adaptive anisotropic diffusion filter, individually customized for each of these three types.Subsequently, the enhanced histograms from the blocks are concatenated to create a comprehensive feature vector representing the original noisy face image.Finally, the HEG descriptor is integrated within a supervised machine learning scheme with a Support Vector Machine as the classifier.The proposed descriptor is evaluated not only in terms of runtime and the standard metrics cited above, but also on the basis of six other similarity metrics, across three online datasets.Experimental results, conducted under different noise levels, clearly demonstrate that the HEG descriptor outperforms nine stateof-the-art descriptors on all three datasets yielding significant enhancements in runtime efficiency, with speed improvements ranging from 1.64 to 29.56 times, and notable refinements in F-score, ranging from 1.03 to 2.39 times.These results highlight the effectiveness of the HEG descriptor in capturing facial features from multimedia noisy files.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207