MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392358793 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.4c00033

Continuous-Wave GeSn Light-Emitting Diodes on Silicon with 2.5 μm Room-Temperature Emission

2024· article· en· W4392358793 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoud R. M. Atalla, Simone Assali, Gérard Daligou, Anis Attiaoui, Sebastian Koelling, Patrick Daoust, Oussama Moutanabbir

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersArmy Research OfficeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMitacsCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsLight-emitting diodeElectroluminescenceDiodeSiliconWaferLight emissionFabricationPhotonicsSilicon photonicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon-compatible short- and midwave infrared emitters are highly sought after for on-chip monolithic integration of electronic and photonic circuits to serve a myriad of applications in sensing and communication. Commercially available infrared light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are predominantly made of III–V materials, which are costly and not silicon-compatible. These materials suffer a degraded performance if the emitting wavelength is longer than 2.35 μm. To address this long-standing challenge, GeSn semiconductors have been proposed as versatile building blocks for silicon-integrated optoelectronic devices. In this regard, this work demonstrates LEDs consisting of a vertical PIN double heterostructure p-Ge 0.94 Sn 0.06 /i-Ge 0.91 Sn 0.09 /n-Ge 0.95 Sn 0.05 grown epitaxially on a silicon wafer using a germanium interlayer and multiple GeSn buffer layers. The emission from these GeSn LEDs at variable diameters in the 40–120 μm range is investigated under both DC and AC operation modes. The fabricated LEDs exhibit room temperature emission in the extended short-wave range centered around 2.5 μm under an injected current density as low as 45 A/cm 2 . By comparing the photoluminescence and electroluminescence signals, it is demonstrated that the LED emission wavelength is not affected by the device fabrication process or heating during the LED operation. Moreover, the measured optical power was found to increase monotonically as the duty cycle increases, indicating that the DC operation yields the highest achievable optical power. The LED emission profile and bandwidth are also presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207