MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Composite Qdrift-product formulas for quantum and classical simulations in real and imaginary time

2024· article· en· W4392359273 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Pocrnic, Matthew Hagan, Juan Carrasquilla, Dvira Segal, Nathan Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchVector InstituteUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute CanadaGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchShared Hierarchical Academic Research Computing NetworkU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsThe ImaginaryComposite numberQuantumProduct (mathematics)Imaginary timeMathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum dynamicsAlgorithmGeometryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent study has shown that it can be advantageous to implement a composite channel that partitions the Hamiltonian <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mi>H</a:mi></a:math> for a given simulation problem into subsets <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mi>A</b:mi></b:math> and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mi>B</c:mi></c:math> such that <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><d:mrow><d:mi>H</d:mi><d:mo>=</d:mo><d:mi>A</d:mi><d:mo>+</d:mo><d:mi>B</d:mi></d:mrow></d:math>, where the terms in <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><e:mi>A</e:mi></e:math> are simulated with a Trotter-Suzuki channel and the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mi>B</f:mi></f:math> terms are randomly sampled via the Qdrift algorithm. Here we extend Qdrift and composite product formulas to imaginary time, formulating candidate classical algorithms for quantum Monte Carlo calculations. We upper bound the induced Schatten-<g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mrow><g:mn>1</g:mn><g:mo>→</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn></g:mrow></g:math> norm on both imaginary-time Qdrift and composite channels. Another recent result demonstrated that simulations of lattice Hamiltonians containing geometrically local interactions can be improved using a Lieb-Robinson argument to decompose <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><h:mi>H</h:mi></h:math> into subsets that contain only terms supported on that subset of the lattice. Here, we provide a quantum algorithm by unifying this result with the composite approach into “local composite channels” and we upper bound the diamond distance. We provide exact numerical simulations of algorithmic cost by counting the number of gates of the form <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:msup><i:mi>e</i:mi><i:mrow><i:mo>−</i:mo><i:mi>i</i:mi><i:msub><i:mi>H</i:mi><i:mi>j</i:mi></i:msub><i:mi>t</i:mi></i:mrow></i:msup></i:math> and <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><j:msup><j:mi>e</j:mi><j:mrow><j:mo>−</j:mo><j:msub><j:mi>H</j:mi><j:mi>j</j:mi></j:msub><j:mi>β</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msup></j:math> to meet a certain error tolerance <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:mi>ε</k:mi></k:math>. In doing so, we optimize the partitioning into sets <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><l:mi>A</l:mi></l:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mi>B</m:mi></m:math> using gradient boosted tree models from machine learning. These numerical studies are important given that product formulas have been historically known to outperform analytic upper bounds. We show constant factor advantages for a variety of interesting Hamiltonians, the maximum of which is a <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><n:mrow><n:mo>≈</n:mo><n:mn>20</n:mn></n:mrow></n:math>-fold speedup that occurs in the simulation of Jellium. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207