MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392359540 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2024.02.021

Are We Implanting Too Many Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators?

2024· article· en· W4392359540 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lebei Pi, Allan C. Skanes, Robert S. McKelvie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary preventionImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorPrimary (astronomy)Intensive care medicineMedical emergencyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Failure Society guidelines recommend optimizing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) prior to implanting primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, often GDMT is suboptimal at the time of ICD implantation, and is associated with reduced survival. Furthermore, with evidence for declining sudden cardiac death (SCD) rates in patients with cardiomyopathy, there is a need for better risk stratification to determine the indication for ICD. 1 This raises concern for potentially unnecessary ICD implantation in this population, and efforts are needed to address this issue in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies→French-language works237,207→