MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392360053 · doi:10.3233/asy-241897

Ground state of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation with a harmonic potential in the energy-critical case

2024· article· en· W4392360053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsymptotic Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround statePointwiseEigenvalues and eigenvectorsInfimum and supremumMathematicsGross–Pitaevskii equationEigenfunctionMathematical analysisPhysicsNorm (philosophy)Quantum mechanicsMathematical physicsQuantum electrodynamicsBose–Einstein condensate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground state of the energy-critical Gross–Pitaevskii equation with a harmonic potential can be constructed variationally. It exists in a finite interval of the eigenvalue parameter. The supremum norm of the ground state vanishes at one end of this interval and diverges to infinity at the other end. We explore the shooting method in the limit of large norm to prove that the ground state is pointwise close to the Aubin–Talenti solution of the energy-critical wave equation in near field and to the confluent hypergeometric function in far field. The shooting method gives the precise dependence of the eigenvalue parameter versus the supremum norm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it