MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analyse du Marché des Plantes Médicinales dans la Région de Lubumbashi : Acteurs et Enjeux Socio-Economiques

2024· article· fr· W4392360641 on OpenAlexfundno aff
François Ntumba Ndaye, Bakari Amuri, Cedrick Mutombo Shakalenga, John Tshomba Kalumbu, Augustin Nge Okwe, Jules Nkulu Mwine Fyama, Pierre Duez

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAcadémie de recherche et d'enseignement supérieurAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malgré le risque d’usage, la croissance du marché incontrôlé des plantes médicinales reste moins renseignée dans la région de Lubumbashi. Pour comprendre son fonctionnement, une enquête a été initiée sur 118 tradipraticiens et herboristes, choisis de manière raisonnée. Les informations recueillies renseignent 85% des praticiens, exercent ce commerce comme principale activité pour leur survie, en facilitant les soins à la population. Près de 166 espèces de plantes, récoltées à l’état sauvage qui circulent sur le marché en circuit court ne sont pas soumises à des autorisations de mise en marché. Elles proviennent surtout des zones rurales des provinces du HautLomami (46 %) et Haut- Katanga (35%). En moyenne, un marchand vendait 52,4 ± 4,1 kg de produit brut et 32,5 ± 3,1 kg en poudre par trimestre. Les prix étaient fixés en fonction de l’apparence des clients et de la perception de la maladie. L’investissement de 6 dollars dans un kilogramme de produits à base des plantes médicinales rapporte un taux de marge d’environ 35%, déterminé par les dépenses et les recettes (0,000 < 0,05). Ce taux de marge démontre que la vente de petites quantités est moins profitable en absence de qualité. De ce fait, Il faut accroitre la valeur ajoutée des produits pour une meilleure rentabilité. Il y a aussi nécessité de réglementer le marché pour un accès sécurisé aux plantes par les consommateurs. Although there are risks involved, the unregulated market for medicinal plants in the Lubumbashi region is not well understood. To gain insight into this market, a survey of 118 traditional practitioners and herbalists, selected at random, was conducted. The results indicate that 85% of these practitioners rely on this trade as their primary source of income, which allows them to provide essential care to the population. Nearly 166 wild-harvested plant species are sold in informal markets without the required marketing authorizations. These products originate mainly from rural areas in Haut – Lomami (46%) and Haut-Katanga (35%) provinces. On average, each dealer sells 52.4 ± 4.1 kg of raw product and 32.5 ± 3.1 kg of powder per quarter. Prices vary according to customers' perception of illness and appearance. Investing $6 in one kilogram of herbal products generates a margin rate of approximately 35%, calculated from expenses and revenues (0,000 < 0.05). This rate implies that selling small quantities of the products is less profitable without quality assurance. Therefore, enhancing the added value of the products is necessary for profitability improvement. Additionally, market regulation is crucial to assure safe and secure access to plants for the consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207