MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392361112 · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129682

Self-assembly of amphiphilic helical-coiled peptide nanofibers and inhibition of fibril formation with curcumin

2024· article· en· W4392361112 on OpenAlexafffund
Grace Daniel, George Hilan, Lisa Ploeg, David A. Sabatino

Bibliographic record

VenueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationCarleton University
KeywordsPeptideAmphiphileNanofiberFibrilChemistryBiophysicsFolding (DSP implementation)Peptide sequenceSelf-assemblyCrystallographyBiochemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceCopolymerOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amphiphilic peptide sequences are conducive to secondary structures that self-assemble into higher-ordered peptide nanostructures. A select set of amphiphilic polycationic peptides displayed stable helical-coiled structures that self-assembled into peptide nanofibers. The progression of peptide fibril formation revealed short protofibrils that extended into thin filaments and into an entangled network of nanofibers over an extended (5 days) incubation period. Ligand binding with 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (ANS) and Congo Red (CR) confirmed the amphiphilic helical-coiled peptide structure assembly into nanofibers, whereas curcumin treatment led to inhibition of fibril formation. Considering the vast repertoire of fibrous biomaterials and peptide or protein (mis)folding contingent on fibril formation, this work relates the molecular interplay in between sequence composition, structural folding and the ligand binding events impacting peptide self-assembly into nanofibers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicSupramolecular Self-Assembly in MaterialsFrench-language works237,207