Deep learning for synovial volume segmentation of the first carpometacarpal joint in osteoarthritis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a deep-learning-based approach to automatically segment 3D ultrasound images of the synovial tissue in osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC1 OA). Design: Deep learning predictions on 2D ultrasound slices sampled in the transverse plane were used to view the synovial tissue of the first carpometacarpal in patients with OA, followed by reconstruction into 3D surfaces. A modified 2D U-Net was trained using a dataset of 832 2D US images resliced from 89 3D US images. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using a testing dataset of 208 2D US images resliced from 15 3D US images. Absolute and signed performance metrics were computed, and segmentation performance was compared between the manual segmentations of raters 1 and 2. Results: Results of the U-Net-based run were mean 3D DSC 86.9 ± 4.8%, recall 93.7 ± 3.6%, precision 81.1 ± 6.9%, volume percent difference 16.9 ± 10.2%, mean surface distance 0.18 ± 0.04 mm, and Hausdorff distance 1.8 ± 0.8 mm. The algorithm demonstrated an overall increase in performance after 3D segmentation reconstruction compared to 2D predictions, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study investigated the use of a modified U-Net algorithm to automatically segment the synovial tissue volume (STV) of CMC1 OA patients and demonstrated that the addition of this deep learning method increases the efficiency of STV estimations in clinical trial settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".