Arf family GTPases are present in Asgard archaea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The emergence of eukaryotes from their prokaryotic ancestors is one of the most fundamental evolutionary events in the history of life. Little is robustly known about how eukaryogenesis occurred, but a major breakthrough came with the identification of the Asgardarchaeota, the closest prokaryotic lineage to eukaryotes yet discovered. Endomembrane organelles, and the capacity to transport material between them, are major hallmarks of eukaryotic cells. The Arf family GTPases are crucial regulators of organelle dynamics in eukaryotes, functioning in vesicle budding, membrane tethering and membrane-cytoskeleton interactions. Although an expanded GTPase complement has been reported in the Asgardarchaeota, the specific origins of the Arf family remain elusive. Here we report a new group of prokaryotic GTPases, the ArfRs. Widely present in Asgardarchaeota and almost exclusive to them, it is the clade from which all eukaryotic Arf family proteins are derived. Heterologous expression of representative Asgardarchaeota ArfR proteins in the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae and X-ray crystallographic studies demonstrate that ArfR GTPases possess the mechanism of membrane binding and structural features unique to Arf family proteins. Our results show that Arf family GTPases are present in Asgardarchaeota, and strongly suggest that they originated in the archaeal contributor to eukaryogenesis, providing support for nascent endomembrane system capacity evolving early in eukaryogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".