MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392371045 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570124

Bearing Fault Diagnosis in Induction Machines Based on Electromagnetic Torque Spectral Frequencies Analysis

2024· article· en· W4392371045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abderrahim Touil, Fatima Babaa, Frédéric Kratz, Ouafae Bennis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Fault (geology)Spectral analysisTorqueElectromagnetic inductionAcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringGeologySeismologyArtificial intelligenceElectromagnetic coil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main aim of this article is to achieve predictive maintenance by proposing reliable residuals specific to outer ring bearing faults.Our work falls within the general context of maintenance, with particular emphasis on vibration analysis techniques.For an in-depth study of the fault, we use spectral analysis of electromagnetic torque, which gives very satisfactory results compared with work based on line current or neutral voltage fault signatures due to the similarity in the mechanical nature of the fault and the signal to be studied.In fact, an analytical calculation of the electromagnetic torque has been developed to obtain the specific frequencies of the fault under consideration.To highlight our results, the simulation of the analytical calculation of this fault was implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK using the Fast Fourier Transform method to extract fault signatures.The induction motor's performance was analyzed under various operating conditions, including both healthy and faulty states.Finally, an experimental study will support our analytical developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207