MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392371045 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570124

Bearing Fault Diagnosis in Induction Machines Based on Electromagnetic Torque Spectral Frequencies Analysis

2024· article· en· W4392371045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abderrahim Touil, Fatima Babaa, Frédéric Kratz, Ouafae Bennis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Fault (geology)Spectral analysisTorqueElectromagnetic inductionAcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringGeologySeismologyArtificial intelligenceElectromagnetic coil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main aim of this article is to achieve predictive maintenance by proposing reliable residuals specific to outer ring bearing faults.Our work falls within the general context of maintenance, with particular emphasis on vibration analysis techniques.For an in-depth study of the fault, we use spectral analysis of electromagnetic torque, which gives very satisfactory results compared with work based on line current or neutral voltage fault signatures due to the similarity in the mechanical nature of the fault and the signal to be studied.In fact, an analytical calculation of the electromagnetic torque has been developed to obtain the specific frequencies of the fault under consideration.To highlight our results, the simulation of the analytical calculation of this fault was implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK using the Fast Fourier Transform method to extract fault signatures.The induction motor's performance was analyzed under various operating conditions, including both healthy and faulty states.Finally, an experimental study will support our analytical developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207