Trans-eQTLs Can Be Used to Untangle the Problem of Coexpression-Causality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the era of GWAS studies, efforts are being made to identify genes underlying complex traits by merging eQTL and GWAS data and assessing the colocalization of eQTLs and GWAS signals. A problem that sometimes occurs in this context is the observation of association between several genes in a genomic region with a trait. This happens because genes in a region could be under the regulatory impact of common elements and coexpress. As such, computational approaches that rely on cis-eQTL information can not exactly pinpoint the causal gene. Here, I report an alternative solution, based on trans-eQTLs to test the association between a gene and a trait. Through the analyses applied to adjacent genes that coexpress and concordantly impact blood traits, I provide evidence that trans-eQTLs can resolve the problem of coexpression-causality without the interference of shared cis-regulatory SNPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it