MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392376213 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.140124

Fostering a Total Construction Safety Culture to Enhance Safety Performance in Indonesia’s New Capital City Establishment

2024· article· en· W4392376213 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Catra Rahma Pashya, Rossy Armyn Machfudiyanto, Akhmad Suraji

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektorat Riset and Pengembangan, Universitas IndonesiaUniversitas Indonesia
KeywordsSafety cultureCapital (architecture)Occupational safety and healthBusinessTransport engineeringEngineeringMedicineGeographyManagementEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Establishment of Indonesia New Capital City (Ibu Kota Nusantara) is an initiative by the Government to promote equal economic and infrastructure development throughout the country.Consequently, the report made from safety awareness reveals several unsafe conditions during the construction project, possibly arising from various factors.In general, safety culture of construction industry mirrors the evolution of 'safety culture theory'.The theory emphasizes developing beliefs and taking practical steps to reduce accidents, specifically in the construction sector.Therefore, this research aimed to validate and review the factors influencing total construction safety culture, in order to improve safety performance.Furthermore, these factors were validated using Delphi method and the results showed that 36 factors contributed to the development of total construction safety culture.This outcome helped in improving safety performance in the establishment of Indonesia New Capital City.Specifically, the 36 factors included those related to workers, management, and project complexity that could influence the development of total construction safety culture.This outcome held significant implications for improving safety performance in the establishment of Indonesia New Capital City and could be applicable in similar contexts, which can used by construction company management to create a strategy to minimize an accident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207