MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392376502 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.140115

Simultaneous Botnet Attack Detection Using Long Short Term Memory-Based Autoencoder and XGBoost Classifier

2024· article· en· W4392376502 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soundes Belkacem

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderBotnetComputer scienceLong short term memoryClassifier (UML)Term (time)Computer securityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningArtificial neural networkRecurrent neural networkThe InternetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Botnet is a cyber-attack that aims to compromise the security of internet of things (IoT) networks by exploiting infected devices to launch attacks and gain unauthorized access to private information.Intrusion detection system (IDS) emerges as critical countermeasures for tackling the risks posed by botnet attacks, playing a crucial role in ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of data in IoT environments.Developing an effective botnet detection system depends on efficient contextual understanding and accurate attack pattern characterization.Recently, deep learning and machine learning based IDS have demonstrated promising results in traffic pattern recognition and identification as normal or malicious from raw data.However, these approaches fail to detect simultaneous botnet attacks as it ignores its distributed nature.In this paper, we propose an efficient hybrid deep learning model for simultaneous botnet attack detection over IoT networks.The twostage hybrid model analyzes the network traffic data captured from three parallel sensors and extracts simultaneous characteristics of attack traffic.The use of parallel detection enables more comprehensive coverage of the network, thereby increasing the detection accuracy of malicious activities that could be missed by a single sensor.Features are extracted using a long-short-term memory base autoencoder (LSTM-AE) over the NCC-2 Simultaneous Botnet Dataset.The LSTM-AE is trained using data from multiple sensors to model temporal characteristics and results in reduced latent representation.Attack type identification is achieved through a multi-class classification using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ensemble learning algorithm.The recently released NCC-2 dataset is the first dataset to provide data representing sequential and simultaneous botnet activities detected concurrently by multiple sensors.Performance exploration indicates that for parallel botnet detection, the proposed LSTM-AE-XGB model achieves high accuracy while reducing false or missing detection.Moreover, to demonstrate model efficiency, we conducted a 10-fold cross-validation and a comparative performance analysis with the state-of-the-art ML and DL-based techniques for feature extraction and simultaneous botnet detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207