MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B045: Adaptive purine metabolism drives radiation therapy resistance in H3K27M-diffuse midline glioma

2024· article· en· W4392376655 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Peterson, Peter Sajjakulnukit, Andrew J. Scott, Caleb Heaslip, Anthony Andren, Kari Wilder-Romans, Angelica Lin, Alexandra M. O’Brien, Zitong Zhao, Li Zhang, Sriram Venneti, Carl Koschmann, Nada Jabado, María G. Castro, Daniel Wahl

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaRadiation therapyPurineMedicineCancer researchMetabolismOncologyInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) are an aggressive and treatment-resistant form of brain cancer in urgent need of new and effective treatment strategies. Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care for DMGs, but these tumors often recur locally within the high-dose radiation field. Therefore, it is imperative to discover methods of overcoming RT resistance. DMGs are often characterized by the presence of driving mutation in the tail domain of histone H3 that converts the 27th residue from a lysine to a methionine (termed H3K27M). How the H2K27M mutation controls metabolism and RT resistance is not known. Using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry metabolomics of irradiated and non-irradiated isogenic pairs, we found that patient-derived H3K27M-expressing cells (referred to as K27M cells going forward) possess altered metabolic profiles distinct from their K27M-KO counterparts, characterized by enrichment in metabolites associated with purine metabolism following RT treatment. Stable isotope tracing with precursors for de novo purine synthesis (15N-amide glutamine) and purine salvage (2H 2,8-hypoxanthine) showed that cells harboring the H3K27M mutation upregulate the de novo synthesis of guanylates but downregulate guanylate salvage. Consistent with these findings, pediatric high-grade glioma tumors and cell lines expressing K27M express lower levels of HPRT1/HGPRT, the rate-limiting enzyme in purine salvage. These findings suggest that K27M cells are preferentially reliant on de novo purine synthesis for guanylate production and that inhibition of this pathway might overcome RT resistance. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that mycophenolic acid (MPA), a clinically available, blood-brain penetrant inhibitor of de novo purine synthesis, radiosensitized K27M neurospheres in vitro. Combination RT+MPA increased survival (38d post-implantation) over RT alone (31.5d post-implantation) in Rag1-KO mice bearing orthotopically implanted K27M tumors but did not cure tumors. To understand potential mechanisms of treatment resistance, we performed stable isotope tracing in irradiated K27M isogenic-paired cell lines. We found an H3K27M-specific, adaptive RT-mediated increase in guanylate salvage that was accompanied by increased HGPRT protein expression following RT. Additionally, we discovered that K27M xenograft tumors had high levels of the purine salvage substrate guanine. These findings suggest that K27M cells upregulate purine salvage to evade the effects of RT, which can confer resistance to inhibitors of de novo purine synthesis. Consistent with this hypothesis, H3K27M tumors in which HPRT1 was knocked down grew without difficulty but were profoundly sensitive to RT, which cured many tumors. These findings suggest that targeting the guanylate salvage pathway in DMG-K27M tumors may be a promising strategy to overcome treatment resistance. Citation Format: Erik R. Peterson, Peter Sajjakulnukit, Andrew Scott, Caleb Heaslip, Anthony Andren, Kari Wilder-Romans, Angelica Lin, Alexandra Obrien, Zitong Zhao, Li Zhang, Sriram Venneti, Carl Koschmann, Nada Jabado, Maria G. Castro, Daniel R. Wahl. Adaptive purine metabolism drives radiation therapy resistance in H3K27M-diffuse midline glioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B045.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→