MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392378230 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570106

Robust Tuning of Optimized Tuned Controller for Wind Power System Network to Improve Power Quality

2024· article· en· W4392378230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahesh Singh, Shimpy Ralhan, Mangal Singh, Rajkumar Jhapte, Pritha Gupta, Ansha Goyal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower qualityControl theory (sociology)Wind powerPower (physics)Computer scienceController (irrigation)Electric power systemQuality (philosophy)Power networkControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a concise overview of research and techniques aimed at enhancing the performance of wind power systems, with a focus on mitigating power quality concerns.Although wind energy has become a more substantial component of the world's energy mix, there are still concerns because wind resources are naturally variable, especially when it comes to electricity quality.The paper highlights the potential of wind energy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and meeting rising electricity demand.In order to improve overall effectiveness in wind power generation, the study emphasizes optimization methodologies and emphasizes the significance of control systems for wind turbines in maximizing power output, adjusting to changing wind conditions, and addressing power quality issues.A grid connected system incorporating the wind power system network along with D STATCOM is modelled with proportional-integral (PI) controller and detailed comparative total harmonic distortion (THD) analysis has been done for various faults.The STATCOM is tuned with genetic algorithms (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and harmony search (HS) based PI controller as a control device to achieve the desired power quality.Leveraging ACO for mitigating THD in wind systems under fault conditions holds promise for substantial enhancements in power quality.This approach has the potential to safeguard equipment, improve system reliability, and contribute to overall performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207