MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392379100 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03584-23

Sequence signatures within the genome of SARS-CoV-2 can be used to predict host source

2024· article· en· W4392379100 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Josip Rudar, Peter Kruczkiewicz, Oksana Vernygora, G. Brian Golding, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Oliver Lung

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of GuelphCanadian Food Inspection Agency
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMinkBiologyGeneticsLineage (genetic)Adaptation (eye)Major histocompatibility complexIn silicoOdocoileusHuman leukocyte antigenImmune systemNegative selectionHost adaptationSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneEpitopeEvolutionary biologyGenomeZoologyAntigenGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

analysis to better understand the potential factors impacting host adaptation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in white-tailed deer, humans, and mink due to the strong evidence of sustained transmission within these hosts. Classification models trained on single nucleotide and amino acid differences between samples effectively identified white-tailed deer-, human-, and mink-derived SARS-CoV-2. For example, the balanced accuracy score of Extremely Randomized Trees classifiers was 0.984 ± 0.006. Eighty-eight commonly identified predictive mutations are found at sites under strong positive and negative selective pressure. A large fraction of sites under selection (86.9%) or identified by machine learning (87.1%) are found in genes other than the spike. Some locations encoded by these gene regions are predicted to be B- and T-cell epitopes or are implicated in modulating the immune response suggesting that host adaptation may involve the evasion of the host immune system, modulation of the class-I major-histocompatibility complex, and the diminished recognition of immune epitopes by CD8+ T cells. Our selection and machine learning analysis also identified that silent mutations, such as C7303T and C9430T, play an important role in discriminating deer-derived samples across multiple clades. Finally, our investigation into the origin of the B.1.641 lineage from white-tailed deer in Canada discovered an additional human sequence from Michigan related to the B.1.641 lineage sampled near the emergence of this lineage. These findings demonstrate that machine-learning approaches can be used in combination with evolutionary genomics to identify factors possibly involved in the cross-species transmission of viruses and the emergence of novel viral lineages.IMPORTANCESevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly transmissible virus capable of infecting and establishing itself in human and wildlife populations, such as white-tailed deer. This fact highlights the importance of developing novel ways to identify genetic factors that contribute to its spread and adaptation to new host species. This is especially important since these populations can serve as reservoirs that potentially facilitate the re-introduction of new variants into human populations. In this study, we apply machine learning and phylogenetic methods to uncover biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 adaptation in mink and white-tailed deer. We find evidence demonstrating that both non-synonymous and silent mutations can be used to differentiate animal-derived sequences from human-derived ones and each other. This evidence also suggests that host adaptation involves the evasion of the immune system and the suppression of antigen presentation. Finally, the methods developed here are general and can be used to investigate host adaptation in viruses other than SARS-CoV-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207