Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The work in this report provides a detailed design and mechanical simulation rib design in flexible trailing edge/morphing wing aircraft. Initially the report initially a brief background knowledge on flexible trailing edge and how to validate design and design changes through simulation software. The report is then divided into two main components that were undertaken during this project. The first part encompasses a design of a rectangular beam in the morphing section. This was achieved by conceptualizing two designs which can be distinguished by their various types of supports. The second part entailed a design of internal structure for the morphing wing. A total of six designs in addition to the initial design were conceptualized which included variations of number of circular structures ranging from two to 4 and variations in locations of these structures. All these designs were 3-D modeled in CATIA-V5 software and were verified by performing ANSYS Finite Element analysis software on these respective 3-D CAD models. The report then provides a detailed comparison between these designs and ultimately provides final design for each component. Finally, the report provides few brief concepts on how this project can be applied and improved in future.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".