MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392383313 · doi:10.32920/25336309

Design of a Computer Vision System for Human Pose Tracking Within the Aircraft Cabin

2024· preprint· en· W4392383313 on OpenAlexaff
Anika Shafi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoseComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEye trackingTracking (education)SittingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passenger comfort is a deterministic factor in today’s competitive air travel industry and particularly for business jets which are increasingly being designed and adapted to maximize comfort for their occupants. Sitting posture could be used as an effective way of gaining insight into passenger comfort. Despite which very few studies have focused on tracking sitting posture in aircraft passengers. Given recent advancements in Computer Vision (CV) and Deep Learning (DL), open-source pre-trained 3D Human Pose Estimation (HPE) algorithms are readily available and can be used to estimate human pose in various conditions. Thus, the primary aim of the thesis was to explore the application of the latest vision algorithms for passenger pose estimation in aircraft cabins and design a prototype for real-time seating pose detection. This entailed use of a pre-trained, open-source, 3D Human Pose Estimation algorithm, MediaPipe Pose, which detects humans in an RGB image, localizes their joint locations and outputs 3D pose landmarks (keypoint locations) in real-time using MediaPipe framework and OpenCV library. This prototype was tested in a real aircraft cabin and the results from the pose estimation were used to draw 3D animation to confirm real-time pose tracking. The system was able to estimate body poses regardless of sitting posture (active, passive, lateral bending to left/right). As such, this thesis proposes a prototype for real-time vision-based 3D pose tracking in aircraft passengers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207