MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392383828 · doi:10.1021/cen-10207-buscon6

PPG may sell a big architectural paint business

2024· article· en· W4392383828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matt Blois

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessArchitectural engineeringBig businessCommerceEngineeringEconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paint and coatings producer PPG Industries is considering strategic alternatives—which could include a sale, joint venture, or partnership—for its US and Canadian architectural coating division. The business sells paints, stains, caulks, adhesives, and sealants; it reported about $1.8 billion in sales last year, about 10% of PPG’s revenue. The firm says architectural paint sales slowed in the region last year because of low demand for do-it-yourself projects, a trend PPG expects will continue. The business includes about 6,600 employees, 750 retail stores, and manufacturing sites in five US states and two Canadian provinces. PPG isn’t selling its architectural coating business in Asia, Europe, or Latin America. The company notes that Mexico has been a particularly strong area for architectural coating sales. PPG is in the midst of reducing its portfolio. Last year, it divested traffic paint businesses in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. In January, PPG announced that it

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0360.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207