MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392387659 · doi:10.1130/b37276.1

Tephra zircon U-Pb geochronology of kimberlite maar sedimentary fills in subarctic Canada: Implications for Eocene paleoclimate and Late Cretaceous paleogeography

2024· article· en· W4392387659 on OpenAlexaffabout
Serhiy D. Buryak, Alberto V. Reyes, Christopher K. West, Britta J.L. Jensen, S. Andrew DuFrane, Joshua H.F.L. Davies, Yan Luo, Jennifer M. Galloway, Peter A. Siver, John A. Westgate, Jesse Reimink, D. Graham Pearson, Alexander P. Wolfe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoGeological Survey of CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalRoyal Tyrrell MuseumUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMaarZirconTephraGeochronologyPaleoclimatologyKimberlitePaleontologyCretaceousGeochemistrySedimentary rockSubarctic climatePalaeogeographyVolcanoClimate changeVolcanismOceanographyMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Wombat and Giraffe kimberlite pipes in the Lac de Gras kimberlite field (64°N, 110°W) of the Northwest Territories, Canada, preserve unique post-eruptive lacustrine and paludal sedimentary records that offer rare insight into high-latitude continental paleoclimate. However, depositional timing—a key datum for atmospheric CO2 and paleoclimatic proxy reconstructions—of these maar infills remains ambiguous and requires refinement because of the large range in the age of kimberlites within the Lac de Gras kimberlite field. Existing constraints for the Giraffe pipe post-eruptive lacustrine and paludal maar sedimentary facies include a maximum Rb-Sr age of ca. 48 Ma (Ypresian, Eocene) based on kimberlitic phlogopite and a glass fission-track age of ca. 38 Ma (Bartonian, Eocene). The age of the Wombat pipe lacustrine maar sediments remains unclear, with unpublished pollen-based biostratigraphy suggesting deposition in the Paleocene (66–56 Ma). In this study, we examine distal rhyolitic tephra beds recovered from exploration drill cores intersecting the Wombat and Giraffe maar facies. We integrate zircon U-Pb laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and chemical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) geochronology, glass fission-track dating, palynology, and tephra glass geochemistry to refine chronological frameworks for these sedimentary deposits. The Giraffe maar CA-ID-TIMS tephra zircon U-Pb dating yielded a Bayesian model age of 47.995 ± 0.082|0.087 Ma (Ypresian) for the upper portion of the lacustrine sediments, while a single zircon grain from tephra in the lowermost lacustrine sediments had an age of 48.72 ± 0.29|0.30 Ma. The revised geochronology for the Giraffe maar provides a working age model for the ~50 m record of lacustrine silt and indicates an age ~10 m.y. older than previously thought. The Wombat maar LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yielded an age of 80.9 ± 1.0 Ma (Campanian), which indicates deposition during the Late Cretaceous. This first radiometric age for the Wombat maar deposits is substantially older than earlier biostratigraphic inferences of a Paleocene age. This new age suggests that the Wombat maar sediments preserve evidence of some of the oldest known freshwater diatoms and synurophytes and provide key constraints for the paleogeography of the Western Interior Seaway during the Late Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207